↓ Skip to main content

Safety and tolerability of intravenous regadenoson in healthy subjects: A randomized, repeat-dose, placebo-controlled study

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Nuclear Cardiology, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
Title
Safety and tolerability of intravenous regadenoson in healthy subjects: A randomized, repeat-dose, placebo-controlled study
Published in
Journal of Nuclear Cardiology, November 2015
DOI 10.1007/s12350-015-0327-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Robert Townsend, Amit Desai, Diane Rammelsberg, Donna Kowalski, Neal Simmons, Therese M. Kitt

Abstract

Regadenoson is a selective A2A adenosine receptor agonist indicated for radionuclide myocardial perfusion imaging in patients unable to undergo adequate exercise stress. However, the safety, tolerability, and plasma concentrations associated with repeated doses have not previously been assessed. Healthy males and females were randomized to receive intravenous regadenoson [100 μg (3 doses), 200 μg (3 doses), or 400 μg (2 doses)], or placebo (2 or 3 doses; 0.9% sodium chloride); all doses 10 minutes apart. The primary endpoint was vital sign measurements (blood pressure and heart rate). Secondary endpoints included 12-lead electrocardiogram measurements, clinical laboratory evaluations (hematology, chemistry, and urinalysis), and adverse events. Thirty-six subjects were randomized and completed the study. Plasma concentrations of regadenoson increased in a dose-related manner and with successive doses. No consistent effect was observed for systolic blood pressure, although diastolic blood pressure was slightly lower than placebo for all regadenoson groups. Transient, dose-dependent increases in heart rate were observed in all regadenoson groups. There were no serious adverse events; 27 adverse events occurred in 14 regadenoson-treated subjects vs two events in two placebo-treated subjects. Repeated doses of regadenoson appeared to be safe and well tolerated in healthy subjects.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 47 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 15%
Student > Bachelor 6 13%
Researcher 6 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 9%
Other 3 6%
Other 8 17%
Unknown 13 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 13%
Sports and Recreations 3 6%
Psychology 3 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Other 8 17%
Unknown 13 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 February 2018.
All research outputs
#20,656,161
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nuclear Cardiology
#1,583
of 2,044 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#289,732
of 393,173 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nuclear Cardiology
#32
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,044 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 393,173 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.