↓ Skip to main content

Methods used to reconstruct historical daily streamflows in northern New Jersey and southeastern New York, water years 1922–2010

Overview of attention for article published in US Geological Survey, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Methods used to reconstruct historical daily streamflows in northern New Jersey and southeastern New York, water years 1922–2010
Published in
US Geological Survey, January 2018
DOI 10.3133/sir20185068
Authors

Hickman, R. Edward, McHugh, Amy R.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 1 50%
Other 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 50%
Energy 1 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 September 2018.
All research outputs
#18,649,291
of 23,103,436 outputs
Outputs from US Geological Survey
#1,830
of 2,161 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#330,923
of 442,715 outputs
Outputs of similar age from US Geological Survey
#197
of 242 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,103,436 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,161 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,715 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 242 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.