↓ Skip to main content

Young people who self-harm: a prospective 1-year follow-up study

Overview of attention for article published in Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
11 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
87 Mendeley
Title
Young people who self-harm: a prospective 1-year follow-up study
Published in
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, November 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00127-015-1149-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Madiha Majid, Maria Tadros, George Tadros, Swaran Singh, Matthew R. Broome, Rachel Upthegrove

Abstract

To explore repetition, service provision and service engagement following presentation of young people to emergency services with self-harm. 969 patients who presented to accident and emergency services after self-harm were followed up prospectively for a period of 1 year. Data on rates, method, clinical history, initial service provision, engagement and repetition (defined as re-presenting to emergency services with further self-harm) were gathered from comprehensive electronic records. Young people were less likely to repeat self-harm compared to those aged 25 and above. A psychiatric history and a history of childhood trauma were significant predictors of repetition. Young people were more likely to receive self-help as their initial service provision, and less likely to receive acute psychiatric care or a hospital admission. There were no differences in engagement with services between young people and those aged 25 and above. Younger individuals may be less vulnerable to repetition, and are less likely to represent to services with repeated self-harm. All young people who present with self-harm should be screened for mental illness and asked about childhood trauma. Whilst young people are less likely to be referred to psychiatric services, they do attend when referred. This may indicate missed opportunity for intervention.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
Mexico 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Portugal 1 1%
Unknown 82 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 13 15%
Researcher 12 14%
Student > Master 11 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 7%
Other 13 15%
Unknown 22 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 24 28%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 18%
Social Sciences 10 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 1%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 27 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 February 2020.
All research outputs
#2,461,795
of 23,794,258 outputs
Outputs from Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
#469
of 2,534 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,877
of 390,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
#3
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,794,258 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,534 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 390,842 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.