You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Microfluidic Bioprinting of Heterogeneous 3D Tissue Constructs Using Low‐Viscosity Bioink
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Advanced Materials, November 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1002/adma.201503310 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Cristina Colosi, Su Ryon Shin, Vijayan Manoharan, Solange Massa, Marco Costantini, Andrea Barbetta, Mehmet Remzi Dokmeci, Mariella Dentini, Ali Khademhosseini |
| Abstract |
A novel bioink and a dispensing technique for 3D tissue engineering applications are presented. The technique incorporates a coaxial extrusion needle using a low-viscosity cell-laden bioink to produce highly defined 3D biostructures. The extrusion system is then coupled to a microfluidic device to control the bioink arrangement deposition demonstrating the versatility of the bioprinting technique. Our low-viscosity cell-responsive bioink promotes cell migration and alignment within each fiber organizing the encapsulated cells. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 50% |
| United States | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 908 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Turkey | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| China | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 898 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 206 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 140 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 114 | 13% |
| Researcher | 100 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 50 | 6% |
| Other | 90 | 10% |
| Unknown | 208 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 229 | 25% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 92 | 10% |
| Materials Science | 90 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 62 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 48 | 5% |
| Other | 133 | 15% |
| Unknown | 254 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 October 2023.
All research outputs
#3,245,977
of 24,577,646 outputs
Outputs from Advanced Materials
#2,895
of 16,509 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,938
of 397,344 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advanced Materials
#61
of 224 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,577,646 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,509 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 397,344 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 224 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.