↓ Skip to main content

Influence of beetroot juice supplementation on intermittent exercise performance

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Applied Physiology, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
55 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages
video
2 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
92 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
371 Mendeley
Title
Influence of beetroot juice supplementation on intermittent exercise performance
Published in
European Journal of Applied Physiology, November 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00421-015-3296-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lee J. Wylie, Stephen J. Bailey, James Kelly, James R. Blackwell, Anni Vanhatalo, Andrew M. Jones

Abstract

This study tested the hypothesis that nitrate (NO3 (-)) supplementation would improve performance during high-intensity intermittent exercise featuring different work and recovery intervals. Ten male team-sport players completed high-intensity intermittent cycling tests during separate 5-day supplementation periods with NO3 (-)-rich beetroot juice (BR; 8.2 mmol NO3 (-) day(-1)) and NO3 (-)-depleted beetroot juice (PL; 0.08 mmol NO3 (-) day(-1)). Subjects completed: twenty-four 6-s all-out sprints interspersed with 24 s of recovery (24 × 6-s); seven 30-s all-out sprints interspersed with 240 s of recovery (7 × 30-s); and six 60-s self-paced maximal efforts interspersed with 60 s of recovery (6 × 60-s); on days 3, 4, and 5 of supplementation, respectively. Plasma [NO2 (-)] was 237 % greater in the BR trials. Mean power output was significantly greater with BR relative to PL in the 24 × 6-s protocol (568 ± 136 vs. 539 ± 136 W; P < 0.05), but not during the 7 × 30-s (558 ± 95 vs. 562 ± 94 W) or 6 × 60-s (374 ± 57 vs. 375 ± 59 W) protocols (P > 0.05). The increase in blood [lactate] across the 24 × 6-s and 7 × 30-s protocols was greater with BR (P < 0.05), but was not different in the 6 × 60-s protocol (P > 0.05). BR might be ergogenic during repeated bouts of short-duration maximal-intensity exercise interspersed with short recovery periods, but not necessarily during longer duration intervals or when a longer recovery duration is applied. These findings suggest that BR might have implications for performance enhancement during some types of intermittent exercise.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 55 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 371 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 <1%
United States 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 367 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 75 20%
Student > Master 69 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 8%
Student > Postgraduate 24 6%
Researcher 14 4%
Other 50 13%
Unknown 110 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 129 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 46 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 26 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 2%
Other 25 7%
Unknown 121 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 45. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 December 2022.
All research outputs
#919,323
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#272
of 4,345 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,261
of 394,393 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#10
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,345 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 394,393 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.