↓ Skip to main content

4-D flow MRI aortic 3-D hemodynamics and wall shear stress remain stable over short-term follow-up in pediatric and young adult patients with bicuspid aortic valve

Overview of attention for article published in Pediatric Radiology, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
Title
4-D flow MRI aortic 3-D hemodynamics and wall shear stress remain stable over short-term follow-up in pediatric and young adult patients with bicuspid aortic valve
Published in
Pediatric Radiology, September 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00247-018-4257-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael J. Rose, Cynthia K. Rigsby, Haben Berhane, Emilie Bollache, Kelly Jarvis, Alex J. Barker, Susanne Schnell, Bradley D. Allen, Joshua D. Robinson, Michael Markl

Abstract

Children with bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) are at risk for serious complications including aortic valve stenosis and aortic rupture. Most studies investigating biomarkers predictive of BAV complications are focused on adults. To investigate whether hemodynamic parameters change over time in children and young adults with BAV by comparing baseline and follow-up four-dimensional (4-D) flow MRI examinations. We retrospectively included 19 children and young adults with BAV who had serial 4-D flow MRI exams (mean difference in scan dates 1.8±1.0 [range, 0.6-3.4 years]). We compared aortic peak blood flow velocity, three-dimensional (3-D) wall shear stress, aortic root and ascending aortic (AAo) z-scores between baseline and follow-up exams. We generated systolic streamlines for all patients and visually compared their baseline and follow-up exams. The only significant difference between baseline and follow-up exams occurred in AAo z-scores (3.12±2.62 vs. 3.59±2.76, P<0.05) indicating growth of the AAo out of proportion to somatic growth. There were no significant changes in either peak velocity or 3-D wall shear stress between baseline and follow-up exams. Ascending aortic peak velocity at baseline correlated with annual change in AAo z-score (r=0.58, P=0.009). Visual assessment revealed abnormal blood flow patterns, which were unique to each patient and remained stable between baseline and follow-up exams. In our pediatric and young adult BAV cohort, hemodynamic markers and systolic blood flow patterns remained stable over short-term follow-up despite significant AAo growth, suggesting minimal acute disease progression. Baseline AAo peak velocity was a predictor of AAo dilation and might help in determining pediatric patients with BAV who are at risk of increased AAo growth.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 38 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 13%
Student > Postgraduate 4 11%
Professor 3 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 8%
Other 8 21%
Unknown 9 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 32%
Engineering 5 13%
Unspecified 2 5%
Psychology 2 5%
Social Sciences 1 3%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 14 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 September 2018.
All research outputs
#15,018,906
of 23,103,436 outputs
Outputs from Pediatric Radiology
#1,274
of 2,095 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#201,499
of 337,287 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pediatric Radiology
#40
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,103,436 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,095 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 337,287 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.