↓ Skip to main content

Invasive ants take and squander native seeds: implications for native plant communities

Overview of attention for article published in Biological Invasions, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
63 Mendeley
Title
Invasive ants take and squander native seeds: implications for native plant communities
Published in
Biological Invasions, September 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10530-018-1829-6
Authors

Adam J. M. Devenish, Crisanto Gomez, Jon R. Bridle, Rosemary J. Newton, Seirian Sumner

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 63 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 19%
Researcher 11 17%
Student > Master 8 13%
Student > Bachelor 7 11%
Other 3 5%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 16 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 30 48%
Environmental Science 6 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Psychology 2 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 3%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 17 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 October 2019.
All research outputs
#13,108,737
of 23,103,436 outputs
Outputs from Biological Invasions
#1,531
of 2,353 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#160,495
of 336,142 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Invasions
#31
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,103,436 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,353 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 336,142 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.