You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
APSIM – Evolution towards a new generation of agricultural systems simulation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Environmental Modelling & Software, December 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.envsoft.2014.07.009 |
| Authors |
Dean P. Holzworth, Neil I. Huth, Peter G. deVoil, Eric J. Zurcher, Neville I. Herrmann, Greg McLean, Karine Chenu, Erik J. van Oosterom, Val Snow, Chris Murphy, Andrew D. Moore, Hamish Brown, Jeremy P.M. Whish, Shaun Verrall, Justin Fainges, Lindsay W. Bell, Allan S. Peake, Perry L. Poulton, Zvi Hochman, Peter J. Thorburn, Donald S. Gaydon, Neal P. Dalgliesh, Daniel Rodriguez, Howard Cox, Scott Chapman, Alastair Doherty, Edmar Teixeira, Joanna Sharp, Rogerio Cichota, Iris Vogeler, Frank Y. Li, Enli Wang, Graeme L. Hammer, Michael J. Robertson, John P. Dimes, Anthony M. Whitbread, James Hunt, Harm van Rees, Tim McClelland, Peter S. Carberry, John N.G. Hargreaves, Neil MacLeod, Cam McDonald, Justin Harsdorf, Sara Wedgwood, Brian A. Keating |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
| Sweden | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,011 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 3 | <1% |
| Australia | 3 | <1% |
| Japan | 2 | <1% |
| Pakistan | 2 | <1% |
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Singapore | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 994 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 203 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 164 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 149 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 67 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 42 | 4% |
| Other | 146 | 14% |
| Unknown | 240 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 347 | 34% |
| Environmental Science | 116 | 11% |
| Engineering | 53 | 5% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 41 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 38 | 4% |
| Other | 111 | 11% |
| Unknown | 305 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 July 2021.
All research outputs
#1,558,127
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Modelling & Software
#50
of 1,659 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,332
of 375,353 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Modelling & Software
#1
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,659 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 375,353 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.