↓ Skip to main content

APSIM – Evolution towards a new generation of agricultural systems simulation

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Modelling & Software, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#48 of 1,538)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1160 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
992 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
APSIM – Evolution towards a new generation of agricultural systems simulation
Published in
Environmental Modelling & Software, December 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.envsoft.2014.07.009
Authors

Dean P. Holzworth, Neil I. Huth, Peter G. deVoil, Eric J. Zurcher, Neville I. Herrmann, Greg McLean, Karine Chenu, Erik J. van Oosterom, Val Snow, Chris Murphy, Andrew D. Moore, Hamish Brown, Jeremy P.M. Whish, Shaun Verrall, Justin Fainges, Lindsay W. Bell, Allan S. Peake, Perry L. Poulton, Zvi Hochman, Peter J. Thorburn, Donald S. Gaydon, Neal P. Dalgliesh, Daniel Rodriguez, Howard Cox, Scott Chapman, Alastair Doherty, Edmar Teixeira, Joanna Sharp, Rogerio Cichota, Iris Vogeler, Frank Y. Li, Enli Wang, Graeme L. Hammer, Michael J. Robertson, John P. Dimes, Anthony M. Whitbread, James Hunt, Harm van Rees, Tim McClelland, Peter S. Carberry, John N.G. Hargreaves, Neil MacLeod, Cam McDonald, Justin Harsdorf, Sara Wedgwood, Brian A. Keating

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 992 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 3 <1%
Australia 3 <1%
Japan 2 <1%
Pakistan 2 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 975 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 205 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 161 16%
Student > Master 146 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 66 7%
Student > Bachelor 41 4%
Other 140 14%
Unknown 233 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 345 35%
Environmental Science 116 12%
Engineering 50 5%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 41 4%
Computer Science 38 4%
Other 104 10%
Unknown 298 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 July 2021.
All research outputs
#1,525,344
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Modelling & Software
#48
of 1,538 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,071
of 369,139 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Modelling & Software
#1
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,538 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 369,139 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.