↓ Skip to main content

Agile convolutional neural network for pulmonary nodule classification using CT images

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
133 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
130 Mendeley
Title
Agile convolutional neural network for pulmonary nodule classification using CT images
Published in
International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery, February 2018
DOI 10.1007/s11548-017-1696-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xinzhuo Zhao, Liyao Liu, Shouliang Qi, Yueyang Teng, Jianhua Li, Wei Qian

Abstract

To distinguish benign from malignant pulmonary nodules using CT images is critical for their precise diagnosis and treatment. A new Agile convolutional neural network (CNN) framework is proposed to conquer the challenges of a small-scale medical image database and the small size of the nodules, and it improves the performance of pulmonary nodule classification using CT images. A hybrid CNN of LeNet and AlexNet is constructed through combining the layer settings of LeNet and the parameter settings of AlexNet. A dataset with 743 CT image nodule samples is built up based on the 1018 CT scans of LIDC to train and evaluate the Agile CNN model. Through adjusting the parameters of the kernel size, learning rate, and other factors, the effect of these parameters on the performance of the CNN model is investigated, and an optimized setting of the CNN is obtained finally. After finely optimizing the settings of the CNN, the estimation accuracy and the area under the curve can reach 0.822 and 0.877, respectively. The accuracy of the CNN is significantly dependent on the kernel size, learning rate, training batch size, dropout, and weight initializations. The best performance is achieved when the kernel size is set to [Formula: see text], the learning rate is 0.005, the batch size is 32, and dropout and Gaussian initialization are used. This competitive performance demonstrates that our proposed CNN framework and the optimization strategy of the CNN parameters are suitable for pulmonary nodule classification characterized by small medical datasets and small targets. The classification model might help diagnose and treat pulmonary nodules effectively.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 130 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 130 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 12%
Researcher 13 10%
Student > Bachelor 12 9%
Lecturer 8 6%
Other 20 15%
Unknown 45 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 25 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 19 15%
Engineering 15 12%
Physics and Astronomy 4 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 2%
Other 12 9%
Unknown 52 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 September 2018.
All research outputs
#20,533,292
of 23,103,436 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery
#679
of 861 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#292,257
of 330,521 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery
#16
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,103,436 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 861 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,521 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.