↓ Skip to main content

An admixture mapping meta-analysis implicates genetic variation at 18q21 with asthma susceptibility in Latinos

Overview of attention for article published in The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
11 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
67 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
An admixture mapping meta-analysis implicates genetic variation at 18q21 with asthma susceptibility in Latinos
Published in
The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, September 2018
DOI 10.1016/j.jaci.2016.08.057
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christopher R Gignoux, Dara G Torgerson, Maria Pino-Yanes, Lawrence H Uricchio, Joshua Galanter, Lindsey A Roth, Celeste Eng, Donglei Hu, Elizabeth A Nguyen, Scott Huntsman, Rasika A Mathias, Rajesh Kumar, Jose Rodriguez-Santana, Neeta Thakur, Sam S Oh, Meghan McGarry, Andres Moreno-Estrada, Karla Sandoval, Cheryl A Winkler, Max A Seibold, Badri Padhukasahasram, David V Conti, Harold J Farber, Pedro Avila, Emerita Brigino-Buenaventura, Michael Lenoir, Kelley Meade, Denise Serebrisky, Luisa N Borrell, William Rodriguez-Cintron, Shannon Thyne, Bonnie R Joubert, Isabelle Romieu, Albert M Levin, Juan-Jose Sienra-Monge, Blanca Estela Del Rio-Navarro, Weiniu Gan, Benjamin A Raby, Scott T Weiss, Eugene Bleecker, Deborah A Meyers, Fernando J Martinez, W James Gauderman, Frank Gilliland, Stephanie J London, Carlos D Bustamante, Dan L Nicolae, Carole Ober, Saunak Sen, Kathleen Barnes, L Keoki Williams, Ryan D Hernandez, Esteban G Burchard

Abstract

Asthma is a common but complex disease with racial/ethnic differences in prevalence, morbidity, and response to therapies. Perform an analysis of genetic ancestry to identify new loci that contribute to asthma susceptibility. We leveraged the mixed ancestry of 3,902 Latinos and performed an admixture mapping meta-analysis for asthma susceptibility. We replicated associations in an independent study of 3,774 Latinos, performed targeted sequencing for fine mapping, and tested for disease correlations with gene expression in the whole blood of >500 individuals from 3 racial/ethnic groups. We identified a genome-wide significant admixture mapping peak at 18q21 in Latinos (p=6.8x10-6), where Native American ancestry was associated with increased risk of asthma (OR=1.20, 95% CI=1.07-1.34, p=0.002) and European ancestry with protection (OR=0.86, 95% CI=0.77-0.96, p=0.008). Our findings replicated in an independent childhood asthma study in Latinos (p=5.3x10-3, combined p=2.6x10-7). Fine mapping of 18q21 in 1,978 Latinos identified a significant association with multiple variants 5' of SMAD2 in Mexicans, whereas a single rare variant in the same window was the top association in Puerto Ricans. Low versus high SMAD2 blood expression was correlated with case status (13.4% lower expression, OR=3.93, 95% CI 2.12-7.28,p<0.001). In addition, lower expression of SMAD2 was associated with more frequent exacerbations among Puerto Ricans with asthma. Ancestry at 18q21 was significantly associated with asthma in Latinos, and implicated multiple ancestry-informative non-coding variants upstream of SMAD2 with asthma susceptibility. Furthermore, decreased SMAD2 expression in blood was strongly associated with increased asthma risk and increased exacerbations.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 67 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 19%
Professor 6 9%
Student > Bachelor 6 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 7%
Student > Master 5 7%
Other 13 19%
Unknown 19 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 10%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 1%
Other 8 12%
Unknown 26 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 July 2020.
All research outputs
#1,520,583
of 25,657,205 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
#1,241
of 11,314 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,192
of 346,825 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
#20
of 125 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,657,205 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,314 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,825 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 125 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.