↓ Skip to main content

Potential determinants of deductible uptake in health insurance: How to increase uptake in The Netherlands?

Overview of attention for article published in HEPAC Health Economics in Prevention and Care, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
78 Mendeley
Title
Potential determinants of deductible uptake in health insurance: How to increase uptake in The Netherlands?
Published in
HEPAC Health Economics in Prevention and Care, November 2015
DOI 10.1007/s10198-015-0745-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

K. P. M. van Winssen, R. C. van Kleef, W. P. M. M. van de Ven

Abstract

In health insurance, voluntary deductibles are offered to the insured in return for a premium rebate. Previous research has shown that 11 % of the Dutch insured opted for a voluntary deductible (VD) in health insurance in 2014, while the highest VD level was financially profitable for almost 50 % of the population in retrospect. To explain this discrepancy, this paper identifies and discusses six potential determinants of the decision to opt for a VD from the behavioral economic literature: loss aversion, risk attitude, ambiguity aversion, debt aversion, omission bias, and liquidity constraints. Based on these determinants, five potential strategies are proposed to increase the number of insured opting for a VD. Presenting the VD as the default option and providing transparent information regarding the VD are the two most promising strategies. If, as a result of these strategies, more insured would opt for a VD, moral hazard would be reduced.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 78 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 21%
Student > Bachelor 11 14%
Researcher 7 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 5%
Other 13 17%
Unknown 21 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 20 26%
Psychology 8 10%
Social Sciences 8 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 5 6%
Other 9 12%
Unknown 21 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 April 2021.
All research outputs
#3,665,243
of 25,604,262 outputs
Outputs from HEPAC Health Economics in Prevention and Care
#229
of 1,310 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,390
of 395,677 outputs
Outputs of similar age from HEPAC Health Economics in Prevention and Care
#5
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,604,262 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,310 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 395,677 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.