↓ Skip to main content

Circulating microRNAs in Disease Diagnostics and their Potential Biological Relevance

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Circulating microRNAs in Disease Diagnostics and their Potential Biological Relevance'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Introduction to microRNAs: Biogenesis, Action, Relevance of Tissue microRNAs in Disease Pathogenesis, Diagnosis and Therapy-The Concept of Circulating microRNAs.
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Extracellular microRNAs in Membrane Vesicles and Non-vesicular Carriers
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Technical Aspects Related to the Analysis of Circulating microRNAs.
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Circulating Blood-Borne microRNAs as Biomarkers in Solid Tumors.
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Circulating microRNA as Biomarkers in Hematological Malignancies.
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Circulating microRNAs as Biomarkers in Cardiovascular Diseases.
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Circulating microRNAs in Neurodegenerative Diseases.
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Circulating Extracellular microRNA in Systemic Autoimmunity.
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Circulating microRNAs in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases.
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Circulating microRNAs in Diabetes Progression: Discovery, Validation, and Research Translation.
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Diagnostic Relevance of microRNAs in Other Body Fluids Including Urine, Feces, and Saliva.
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Circulating microRNAs as Hormones: Intercellular and Inter-organ Conveyors of Epigenetic Information?
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Are Circulating microRNAs Involved in Tumor Surveillance?
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Hypothetic Interindividual and Interspecies Relevance of microRNAs Released in Body Fluids.
Attention for Chapter 3: Technical Aspects Related to the Analysis of Circulating microRNAs.
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Technical Aspects Related to the Analysis of Circulating microRNAs.
Chapter number 3
Book title
Circulating microRNAs in Disease Diagnostics and their Potential Biological Relevance
Published in
EXS, January 2015
DOI 10.1007/978-3-0348-0955-9_3
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-03-480953-5, 978-3-03-480955-9
Authors

Butz, Henriett, Patócs, Attila, Henriett Butz, Attila Patócs

Abstract

Specific and sensitive noninvasive biofluid-based biomarkers are always needed in the laboratory diagnosis of diseases. Biomarkers are applied not only for diagnostic purposes but for stratifying a disease and for assessing the therapy response or disease progression. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are short noncoding RNA molecules regulating gene expression posttranscriptionally. They are frequently dysregulated in many physiological and pathophysiological conditions. miRNAs are present in the circulation and in other biofluids that are common matrices for clinical laboratory testing that has raised the possibility that miRNAs may serve as novel biomarkers. Their excellent stability also supports the possibility that miRNAs once will be routinely used biomarkers in clinical practice. From an analytical point of view, there are many factors (starting material, sample storage and processing, different RNA extraction and detection methods, intra- and interassay variability, and assay interferences) to consider if a miRNA as biomarker is aimed to be introduced as a clinical laboratory test. Despite several pre-analytical and analytical factors that still need standardization, a significant number of studies have been published about the potential role of circulating miRNAs as biomarkers. Due to the lack of standardization of methods, there are a lot of discrepancies among results. In this chapter, we aimed to summarize the current findings about circulating miRNAs focusing on the analytical points related to miRNAs measurements from biofluids.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 31%
Student > Master 3 23%
Researcher 2 15%
Student > Bachelor 2 15%
Unknown 2 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 15%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 8%
Neuroscience 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Unknown 4 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2015.
All research outputs
#17,778,101
of 22,834,308 outputs
Outputs from EXS
#68
of 94 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#241,935
of 353,194 outputs
Outputs of similar age from EXS
#6
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,834,308 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 94 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.7. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,194 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.