↓ Skip to main content

The TLR7/8/9 Antagonist IMO-8503 Inhibits Cancer-Induced Cachexia

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer Research, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The TLR7/8/9 Antagonist IMO-8503 Inhibits Cancer-Induced Cachexia
Published in
Cancer Research, December 2018
DOI 10.1158/0008-5472.can-17-3878
Pubmed ID
Authors

Federica Calore, Priya Londhe, Paolo Fadda, Giovanni Nigita, Lucia Casadei, Gioacchino Paolo Marceca, Matteo Fassan, Francesca Lovat, Pierluigi Gasparini, Lara Rizzotto, Nicola Zanesi, Devine Jackson, Svasti Mehta, Patrick Nana-Sinkam, Deepa Sampath, Raphael E. Pollock, Denis C. Guttridge, Carlo M. Croce

Abstract

Muscle wasting is a feature of the cachexia syndrome, which contributes significantly to cancer patient mortality. We have previously demonstrated that miR-21 is secreted through extracellular vesicles (EVs) by lung and pancreatic cancer cells and promotes JNK-dependent cell death through its binding to the TLR7 receptor in murine myoblasts. Here we evaluate the ability of IMO-8503, a TLR7, 8 and 9 antagonist, to inhibit cancer-induced cachexia. Using EVs isolated from lung and pancreatic cancer cells and from patient plasma samples, we demonstrate that IMO-8503 inhibits cell death induced by circulating miRNAs with no significant toxicity. Intraperitoneal administration of the antagonist in a murine model for Lewis Lung Carcinoma (LLC-induced cachexia) strongly impaired several cachexia-related features, such as expression of Pax7 as well as caspase 3 and PARP cleavage in skeletal muscles, and significantly prevented the loss of lean mass in tumor-bearing mice. IMO-8503 also impaired circulating miRNA-induced cell death in human primary myoblasts. Taken together, our findings strongly indicate that IMO-8503 serves as a potential therapy for the treatment of cancer cachexia.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 39 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 13%
Student > Bachelor 4 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Professor 3 8%
Other 5 13%
Unknown 14 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 5%
Computer Science 2 5%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 15 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 October 2019.
All research outputs
#14,715,070
of 25,559,053 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Research
#13,773
of 18,675 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#220,460
of 446,481 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Research
#70
of 134 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,559,053 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 18,675 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,481 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 134 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.