You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
New spaces of disruption? The failures of Bitcoin and the rhetorical power of algorithmic governance
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Geoforum, November 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.geoforum.2018.08.023 |
| Authors |
Matthew A. Zook, Joe Blankenship |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 6 | 38% |
| United States | 2 | 13% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 13% |
| India | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 5 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 56% |
| Scientists | 4 | 25% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 19% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 221 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 221 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 37 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 32 | 14% |
| Lecturer | 20 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 6% |
| Other | 34 | 15% |
| Unknown | 67 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Business, Management and Accounting | 40 | 18% |
| Social Sciences | 29 | 13% |
| Computer Science | 29 | 13% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 20 | 9% |
| Engineering | 8 | 4% |
| Other | 15 | 7% |
| Unknown | 80 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 December 2022.
All research outputs
#4,104,383
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Geoforum
#541
of 2,194 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#77,077
of 363,432 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Geoforum
#18
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,194 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,432 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.