↓ Skip to main content

Controversies in Surgical Oncology: Does the Minimally Invasive Approach for Rectal Cancer Provide Equivalent Oncologic Outcomes Compared with the Open Approach?

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Surgical Oncology, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
Title
Controversies in Surgical Oncology: Does the Minimally Invasive Approach for Rectal Cancer Provide Equivalent Oncologic Outcomes Compared with the Open Approach?
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology, September 2018
DOI 10.1245/s10434-018-6740-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Robert K. Cleary, Arden M. Morris, George J. Chang, Amy L. Halverson

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 55 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 11%
Researcher 5 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 5%
Student > Postgraduate 3 5%
Other 6 11%
Unknown 23 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 27%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 9%
Engineering 2 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 4%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 22 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 March 2020.
All research outputs
#6,518,756
of 23,103,436 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#2,215
of 6,553 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#115,409
of 335,870 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#59
of 132 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,103,436 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,553 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 335,870 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 132 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.