↓ Skip to main content

Long-term meditation training induced changes in the operational synchrony of default mode network modules during a resting state

Overview of attention for article published in Cognitive Processing, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
49 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
143 Mendeley
Title
Long-term meditation training induced changes in the operational synchrony of default mode network modules during a resting state
Published in
Cognitive Processing, November 2015
DOI 10.1007/s10339-015-0743-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrew A. Fingelkurts, Alexander A. Fingelkurts, Tarja Kallio-Tamminen

Abstract

Using theoretical analysis of self-consciousness concept and experimental evidence on the brain default mode network (DMN) that constitutes the neural signature of self-referential processes, we hypothesized that the anterior and posterior subnets comprising the DMN should show differences in their integrity as a function of meditation training. Functional connectivity within DMN and its subnets (measured by operational synchrony) has been measured in ten novice meditators using an electroencephalogram (EEG) recording in a pre-/post-meditation intervention design. We have found that while the whole DMN was clearly suppressed, different subnets of DMN responded differently after 4 months of meditation training: The strength of EEG operational synchrony in the right and left posterior modules of the DMN decreased in resting post-meditation condition compared to a pre-meditation condition, whereas the frontal DMN module on the contrary exhibited an increase in the strength of EEG operational synchrony. These findings combined with published data on functional-anatomic heterogeneity within the DMN and on trait subjective experiences commonly found following meditation allow us to propose that the first-person perspective and the sense of agency (the witnessing observer) are presented by the frontal DMN module, while the posterior modules of the DMN are generally responsible for the experience of the continuity of 'I' as embodied and localized within bodily space. Significance of these findings is discussed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 143 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Romania 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Unknown 136 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 18%
Student > Master 20 14%
Researcher 17 12%
Student > Bachelor 15 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 10%
Other 19 13%
Unknown 32 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 25 17%
Psychology 24 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 10%
Engineering 7 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 5%
Other 26 18%
Unknown 39 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 March 2016.
All research outputs
#17,778,101
of 22,834,308 outputs
Outputs from Cognitive Processing
#227
of 337 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#191,971
of 285,082 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cognitive Processing
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,834,308 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 337 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.3. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 285,082 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.