↓ Skip to main content

High-throughput imaging-based nephrotoxicity prediction for xenobiotics with diverse chemical structures

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Toxicology, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user
patent
5 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
50 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
Title
High-throughput imaging-based nephrotoxicity prediction for xenobiotics with diverse chemical structures
Published in
Archives of Toxicology, November 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00204-015-1638-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ran Su, Sijing Xiong, Daniele Zink, Lit-Hsin Loo

Abstract

The kidney is a major target for xenobiotics, which include drugs, industrial chemicals, environmental toxicants and other compounds. Accurate methods for screening large numbers of potentially nephrotoxic xenobiotics with diverse chemical structures are currently not available. Here, we describe an approach for nephrotoxicity prediction that combines high-throughput imaging of cultured human renal proximal tubular cells (PTCs), quantitative phenotypic profiling, and machine learning methods. We automatically quantified 129 image-based phenotypic features, and identified chromatin and cytoskeletal features that can predict the human in vivo PTC toxicity of 44 reference compounds with ~82 % (primary PTCs) or 89 % (immortalized PTCs) test balanced accuracies. Surprisingly, our results also revealed that a DNA damage response is commonly induced by different PTC toxicants that have diverse chemical structures and injury mechanisms. Together, our results show that human nephrotoxicity can be predicted with high efficiency and accuracy by combining cell-based and computational methods that are suitable for automation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Unknown 56 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 13 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 19%
Researcher 8 14%
Student > Master 5 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 5%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 12 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 16%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 14%
Computer Science 4 7%
Chemistry 4 7%
Other 8 14%
Unknown 15 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 May 2022.
All research outputs
#1,605,571
of 22,834,308 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Toxicology
#101
of 2,640 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,240
of 387,438 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Toxicology
#2
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,834,308 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,640 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 387,438 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.