↓ Skip to main content

European Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice (version 2012) The Fifth Joint Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and Other Societies on Cardiovascular…

Overview of attention for article published in Atherosclerosis (00219150), May 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
2 policy sources
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
332 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
309 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
European Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice (version 2012) The Fifth Joint Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and Other Societies on Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in Clinical Practice (constituted by representatives of nine societies and by invited experts)
Published in
Atherosclerosis (00219150), May 2012
DOI 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2012.05.007
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joep Perk, Guy De Backer, Helmut Gohlke, Ian Graham, Željko Reiner, W.M. Monique Verschuren, Christian Albus, Pascale Benlian, Gudrun Boysen, Renata Cifkova, Christi Deaton, Shah Ebrahim, Miles Fisher, Giuseppe Germano, Richard Hobbs, Arno Hoes, Sehnaz Karadeniz, Alessandro Mezzani, Eva Prescott, Lars Ryden, Martin Scherer, Mikko Syvänne, Wilma J.M. Scholte Op Reimer, Christiaan Vrints, David Wood, Jose Luis Zamorano, Faiez Zannad

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 309 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Sudan 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Egypt 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 296 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 45 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 12%
Student > Bachelor 37 12%
Researcher 28 9%
Student > Postgraduate 26 8%
Other 72 23%
Unknown 64 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 112 36%
Nursing and Health Professions 34 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 7%
Psychology 12 4%
Computer Science 11 4%
Other 48 16%
Unknown 69 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 June 2019.
All research outputs
#2,255,558
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Atherosclerosis (00219150)
#411
of 5,778 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,400
of 179,490 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Atherosclerosis (00219150)
#3
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,778 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 179,490 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.