↓ Skip to main content

Proximal humerus reconstruction after tumour resection: biological versus endoprosthetic reconstruction

Overview of attention for article published in International Orthopaedics, November 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Citations

dimensions_citation
95 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
67 Mendeley
Title
Proximal humerus reconstruction after tumour resection: biological versus endoprosthetic reconstruction
Published in
International Orthopaedics, November 2010
DOI 10.1007/s00264-010-1152-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michiel A. J. van de Sande, P. D. Sander Dijkstra, Antonie H. M. Taminiau

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 1%
Greece 1 1%
Ukraine 1 1%
Italy 1 1%
Unknown 63 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 19%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 10%
Student > Master 6 9%
Student > Bachelor 5 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 7%
Other 14 21%
Unknown 17 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 35 52%
Engineering 4 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 1%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 1%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 19 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 October 2015.
All research outputs
#4,180,871
of 22,834,308 outputs
Outputs from International Orthopaedics
#155
of 1,428 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,089
of 180,267 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Orthopaedics
#2
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,834,308 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,428 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 180,267 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.