| Title |
Spontaneous use of tools as straws in great apes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Animal Cognition, December 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10071-010-0355-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Héctor Marín Manrique, Josep Call |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 2 | 3% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Austria | 1 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 71 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 17 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 21% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 12% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 7 | 9% |
| Unknown | 12 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 28 | 36% |
| Psychology | 22 | 28% |
| Engineering | 3 | 4% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 3% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 8 | 10% |
| Unknown | 13 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 July 2018.
All research outputs
#1,201,803
of 22,834,308 outputs
Outputs from Animal Cognition
#285
of 1,452 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,208
of 180,264 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Animal Cognition
#3
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,834,308 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,452 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 180,264 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.