↓ Skip to main content

Academic Guidance in Medical Student Research: How Well Do Supervisors and Students Understand the Ethics of Human Research?

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Academic Ethics, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
Title
Academic Guidance in Medical Student Research: How Well Do Supervisors and Students Understand the Ethics of Human Research?
Published in
Journal of Academic Ethics, November 2015
DOI 10.1007/s10805-015-9248-0
Authors

Kathryn M. Weston, Judy R. Mullan, Wendy Hu, Colin Thomson, Warren C. Rich, Patricia Knight-Billington, Brahmaputra Marjadi, Peter L. McLennan

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 32 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 13%
Lecturer 3 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Researcher 2 6%
Student > Postgraduate 2 6%
Other 5 16%
Unknown 14 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 19%
Psychology 3 9%
Social Sciences 2 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 15 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 February 2016.
All research outputs
#6,973,730
of 23,316,003 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Academic Ethics
#115
of 236 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#107,005
of 389,061 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Academic Ethics
#3
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,316,003 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 236 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 389,061 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.