| Title |
Temperature-related mortality impacts under and beyond Paris Agreement climate change scenarios
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Climatic Change, September 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10584-018-2274-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ana Maria Vicedo-Cabrera, Yuming Guo, Francesco Sera, Veronika Huber, Carl-Friedrich Schleussner, Dann Mitchell, Shilu Tong, Micheline de Sousa Zanotti Stagliorio Coelho, Paulo Hilario Nascimento Saldiva, Eric Lavigne, Patricia Matus Correa, Nicolas Valdes Ortega, Haidong Kan, Samuel Osorio, Jan Kyselý, Aleš Urban, Jouni J. K. Jaakkola, Niilo R. I. Ryti, Mathilde Pascal, Patrick G. Goodman, Ariana Zeka, Paola Michelozzi, Matteo Scortichini, Masahiro Hashizume, Yasushi Honda, Magali Hurtado-Diaz, Julio Cruz, Xerxes Seposo, Ho Kim, Aurelio Tobias, Carmen Íñiguez, Bertil Forsberg, Daniel Oudin Åström, Martina S. Ragettli, Martin Röösli, Yue Leon Guo, Chang-fu Wu, Antonella Zanobetti, Joel Schwartz, Michelle L. Bell, Tran Ngoc Dang, Dung Do Van, Clare Heaviside, Sotiris Vardoulakis, Shakoor Hajat, Andy Haines, Ben Armstrong, Kristie L. Ebi, Antonio Gasparrini |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 60 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 10 | 17% |
| United Kingdom | 6 | 10% |
| United States | 4 | 7% |
| Australia | 3 | 5% |
| Switzerland | 2 | 3% |
| Japan | 1 | 2% |
| Mexico | 1 | 2% |
| Finland | 1 | 2% |
| South Africa | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 29 | 48% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 42 | 70% |
| Scientists | 13 | 22% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 5% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 277 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 277 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 57 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 31 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 28 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 28 | 10% |
| Other | 10 | 4% |
| Other | 36 | 13% |
| Unknown | 87 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 46 | 17% |
| Engineering | 21 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 6% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 18 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 5% |
| Other | 60 | 22% |
| Unknown | 101 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 360. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 August 2023.
All research outputs
#88,153
of 25,292,646 outputs
Outputs from Climatic Change
#46
of 6,020 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,782
of 344,244 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Climatic Change
#2
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,292,646 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,020 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,244 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.