↓ Skip to main content

Identification of multiple risk loci and regulatory mechanisms influencing susceptibility to multiple myeloma

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Communications, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
36 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
188 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Identification of multiple risk loci and regulatory mechanisms influencing susceptibility to multiple myeloma
Published in
Nature Communications, September 2018
DOI 10.1038/s41467-018-04989-w
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have transformed our understanding of susceptibility to multiple myeloma (MM), but much of the heritability remains unexplained. We report a new GWAS, a meta-analysis with previous GWAS and a replication series, totalling 9974 MM cases and 247,556 controls of European ancestry. Collectively, these data provide evidence for six new MM risk loci, bringing the total number to 23. Integration of information from gene expression, epigenetic profiling and in situ Hi-C data for the 23 risk loci implicate disruption of developmental transcriptional regulators as a basis of MM susceptibility, compatible with altered B-cell differentiation as a key mechanism. Dysregulation of autophagy/apoptosis and cell cycle signalling feature as recurrently perturbed pathways. Our findings provide further insight into the biological basis of MM.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 36 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 188 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 188 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 35 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 14%
Student > Master 17 9%
Student > Bachelor 14 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 5%
Other 22 12%
Unknown 65 35%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 39 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 30 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 2%
Other 20 11%
Unknown 78 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 July 2024.
All research outputs
#1,562,098
of 32,630,464 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#24,310
of 78,752 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,616
of 368,277 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#523
of 1,447 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,630,464 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 78,752 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 49.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,277 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,447 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.