↓ Skip to main content

Neural representations of faces and limbs neighbor in human high-level visual cortex: evidence for a new organization principle

Overview of attention for article published in Psychological Research, December 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Citations

dimensions_citation
193 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
247 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Neural representations of faces and limbs neighbor in human high-level visual cortex: evidence for a new organization principle
Published in
Psychological Research, December 2011
DOI 10.1007/s00426-011-0392-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kevin S. Weiner, Kalanit Grill-Spector

Abstract

Neurophysiology and optical imaging studies in monkeys and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies in both monkeys and humans have localized clustered neural responses in inferotemporal cortex selective for images of biologically relevant categories, such as faces and limbs. Using higher resolution (1.5 mm voxels) fMRI scanning methods than past studies (3-5 mm voxels), we recently reported a network of multiple face- and limb-selective regions that neighbor one another in human ventral temporal cortex (Weiner and Grill-Spector, Neuroimage, 52(4):1559-1573, 2010) and lateral occipitotemporal cortex (Weiner and Grill-Spector, Neuroimage, 56(4):2183-2199, 2011). Here, we expand on three basic organization principles of high-level visual cortex revealed by these findings: (1) consistency in the anatomical location of functional regions, (2) preserved spatial relationship among functional regions, and (3) a topographic organization of face- and limb-selective regions in adjacent and alternating clusters. We highlight the implications of this structure in comparing functional brain organization between typical and atypical populations. We conclude with a new model of high-level visual cortex consisting of ventral, lateral, and dorsal components, where multimodal processing related to vision, action, haptics, and language converges in the lateral pathway.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 247 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 3%
Germany 4 2%
United Kingdom 4 2%
Canada 3 1%
Chile 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 226 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 71 29%
Researcher 56 23%
Student > Master 28 11%
Professor 21 9%
Student > Bachelor 10 4%
Other 35 14%
Unknown 26 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 93 38%
Neuroscience 47 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 25 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 5%
Engineering 8 3%
Other 18 7%
Unknown 44 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2014.
All research outputs
#14,722,660
of 22,659,164 outputs
Outputs from Psychological Research
#514
of 963 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#158,582
of 240,151 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychological Research
#8
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,659,164 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 963 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,151 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.