↓ Skip to main content

Why wait? Reasons for delay and prompts to seek help for mental health problems in an Australian clinical sample

Overview of attention for article published in Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, June 2004
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
204 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
209 Mendeley
Title
Why wait? Reasons for delay and prompts to seek help for mental health problems in an Australian clinical sample
Published in
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, June 2004
DOI 10.1007/s00127-004-0816-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anna Thompson, Caroline Hunt, Cathy Issakidis

Abstract

The initial delay to seek treatment accounts for a significant proportion of the unmet need for treatment of common psychiatric conditions. This study aimed to examine the barriers to initial help-seeking and factors that facilitate help-seeking for anxiety and depression. Help-seeking history was retrospectively self-reported by 233 patients at a specialist anxiety clinic, all of whom had delayed seeking professional treatment for at least one month. Data gathered included age at onset, age at help-seeking, primary reason for the delay, prompt to seek help and first professional contacted. The most frequently endorsed reasons for the delay related to lack of knowledge about mental illness or available treatment. Increasing illness severity or disability was the primary prompt to seek help for the majority of respondents. Reason for the delay showed some relationship with length of the delay, but prompt to seek help did not. A general medical practitioner (GP) was the first professional contacted in 71 % of cases. Lack of public 'mental health literacy' contributes to slow problem recognition. Increasing illness severity eventually facilitates problem recognition and prompts help-seeking. Structural barriers to initial help-seeking are relatively unimportant within the Australian health care system. General practitioners play an important role as gate-keepers to appropriate mental health care.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 209 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 1%
United States 2 <1%
Unknown 204 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 37 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 16%
Student > Bachelor 33 16%
Researcher 19 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 7%
Other 31 15%
Unknown 41 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 94 45%
Medicine and Dentistry 37 18%
Social Sciences 10 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 2%
Arts and Humanities 4 2%
Other 17 8%
Unknown 42 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 January 2023.
All research outputs
#2,858,490
of 23,794,258 outputs
Outputs from Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
#548
of 2,534 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,708
of 58,626 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
#2
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,794,258 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,534 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 58,626 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.