↓ Skip to main content

Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology Volume 237

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 6: A Review and Assessment of Spent Lead Ammunition and Its Exposure and Effects to Scavenging Birds in the United States
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#16 of 191)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
policy
1 policy source
twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
61 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
A Review and Assessment of Spent Lead Ammunition and Its Exposure and Effects to Scavenging Birds in the United States
Chapter number 6
Book title
Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology Volume 237
Published in
Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, January 2016
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-23573-8_6
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-923572-1, 978-3-31-923573-8
Authors

Golden, Nancy H, Warner, Sarah E, Coffey, Michael J, Nancy H. Golden, Sarah E. Warner, Michael J. Coffey, Golden, Nancy H., Warner, Sarah E., Coffey, Michael J.

Abstract

There are multiple sources of lead in the environment. However, scientific evidence points to spent lead ammunition as the most frequent cause of lead exposure and poisoning in scavenging birds in the United States. Despite the ban on its use for waterfowl hunting, lead ammunition is still widely used for other hunting and shooting activities. Therefore, it can remain on the landscape in carcasses not retrieved and in discarded offal piles. Carcasses and gut piles can be attractive food sources to scavenging birds that can ingest bullet fragments or shot while feeding. Scavenging birds may be particularly vulnerable to exposure and effects of lead due to their foraging strategies and food preferences, physiological processes that facilitate the absorption of lead, and demographic traits. Numerous lines of evidence support ammunition as the source of exposure in the majority of lead poisoned scavenging birds and include the recovery of ingested lead fragments or shot from exposed birds, observations of birds feeding on contaminated carcasses, isotopic signatures of lead in tissue that match that found in ammunition, patterns of mortality coincident with hunting seasons, and the lack of abundant evidence for other lead sources. Lead can be replaced in ammunition by alternative metals that are currently available and present limited environmental threats.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 61 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 16%
Student > Master 9 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 8%
Other 5 8%
Student > Bachelor 3 5%
Other 9 15%
Unknown 20 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 15 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 21%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 6 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 21 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 February 2023.
All research outputs
#1,460,389
of 25,271,884 outputs
Outputs from Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology
#16
of 191 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,992
of 406,193 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology
#1
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,271,884 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 191 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 406,193 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.