↓ Skip to main content

The central role of RNA in human development and cognition

Overview of attention for article published in Febs Letters, May 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
199 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
267 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The central role of RNA in human development and cognition
Published in
Febs Letters, May 2011
DOI 10.1016/j.febslet.2011.05.001
Pubmed ID
Authors

John S. Mattick

Abstract

It appears that the genetic programming of humans and other complex organisms has been misunderstood for the past 50 years, due to the assumption that most genetic information is transacted by proteins. However, the human genome contains only about 20,000 protein-coding genes, similar in number and with largely orthologous functions as those in nematodes that have only 1000 somatic cells. By contrast, the extent of non-protein-coding DNA increases with increasing complexity, reaching 98.8% in humans. The majority of these sequences are dynamically transcribed, mainly into non-protein-coding RNAs, with tens if not hundreds of thousands that show specific expression patterns and subcellular locations, as well as many classes of small regulatory RNAs. The emerging evidence indicates that these RNAs control the epigenetic states that underpin development, and that many are dysregulated in cancer and other complex diseases. Moreover it appears that animals, particularly primates, have evolved plasticity in these RNA regulatory systems, especially in the brain. Thus, it appears that what was dismissed as 'junk' because it was not understood holds the key to understanding human evolution, development, and cognition.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 267 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 3%
Italy 3 1%
France 2 <1%
Japan 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Other 5 2%
Unknown 242 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 72 27%
Researcher 58 22%
Student > Master 31 12%
Student > Bachelor 25 9%
Professor 16 6%
Other 44 16%
Unknown 21 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 126 47%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 60 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 18 7%
Neuroscience 10 4%
Computer Science 5 2%
Other 25 9%
Unknown 23 9%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 November 2023.
All research outputs
#1,761,020
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Febs Letters
#151
of 14,373 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,447
of 121,699 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Febs Letters
#2
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,373 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 121,699 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.