↓ Skip to main content

Epidural Analgesia for Pancreatoduodenectomy: A Critical Appraisal

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, February 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
75 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
67 Mendeley
Title
Epidural Analgesia for Pancreatoduodenectomy: A Critical Appraisal
Published in
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, February 2008
DOI 10.1007/s11605-008-0467-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wande B. Pratt, Richard A. Steinbrook, Shishir K. Maithel, Tsafrir Vanounou, Mark P. Callery, Charles M. Vollmer

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
United States 1 1%
France 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 63 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 13%
Student > Postgraduate 8 12%
Student > Master 7 10%
Other 5 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 7%
Other 15 22%
Unknown 18 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 35 52%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 1%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 1%
Psychology 1 1%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 22 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 September 2018.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery
#760
of 2,485 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,987
of 173,634 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery
#2
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,485 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 173,634 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 8 of them.