↓ Skip to main content

The endoscopic management of pancreatic fistulas

Overview of attention for article published in Surgical Endoscopy, February 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
47 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
The endoscopic management of pancreatic fistulas
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy, February 2005
DOI 10.1007/s00464-004-9140-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

J. Halttunen, L. Weckman, E. Kemppainen, M. L. Kylänpää

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 4%
Belarus 1 4%
Unknown 22 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 29%
Researcher 7 29%
Unspecified 1 4%
Professor 1 4%
Librarian 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 5 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 54%
Arts and Humanities 1 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Unspecified 1 4%
Unknown 8 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 September 2018.
All research outputs
#8,759,452
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Surgical Endoscopy
#1,902
of 6,989 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,956
of 74,314 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Surgical Endoscopy
#6
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,989 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 74,314 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.