| Title |
Review and advancement of the marine biotic resource use metric in seafood LCAs: a case study of Norwegian salmon feed
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, March 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11367-016-1092-y |
| Authors |
Tim Cashion, Sara Hornborg, Friederike Ziegler, Erik Skontorp Hognes, Peter Tyedmers |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Fiji | 1 | 33% |
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| Sweden | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 90 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 21% |
| Researcher | 15 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 14 | 15% |
| Unknown | 15 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 21 | 23% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 19 | 21% |
| Engineering | 7 | 8% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 3% |
| Energy | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 10 | 11% |
| Unknown | 28 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 September 2018.
All research outputs
#16,689,742
of 25,998,826 outputs
Outputs from The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment
#961
of 1,131 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#179,077
of 318,591 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment
#32
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,998,826 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,131 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.7. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 318,591 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.