You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Composite sustainable manufacturing practice and performance framework: Chinese auto-parts suppliers׳ perspective
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Production Economics, December 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.09.035 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Zhen Wang, Nachiappan Subramanian, Angappa Gunasekaran, Muhammad D. Abdulrahman, Chang Liu |
| Abstract |
High-throughput DNA sequencing techniques have greatly accelerated the pace of research into the repertoires of antibody and T cell receptor gene rearrangements that confer antigen specificity to adaptive immune responses. Studies of aging-related changes in human B cell repertoires have benefited from the ability to detect and quantify thousands to millions of B cell clones in human samples, and study the mutational lineages and isotype switching relationships within each clonal lineage. Correlation of repertoire analysis with antibody gene data from antigen-specific B cells is poised to give much greater insight into clinically relevant B cell responses and memory storage. Here, we describe strategies for preparing and analyzing human antibody gene libraries for studying B cell repertoires. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 269 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 264 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 48 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 44 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 25 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 21 | 8% |
| Researcher | 16 | 6% |
| Other | 47 | 17% |
| Unknown | 68 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 89 | 33% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 47 | 17% |
| Social Sciences | 10 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 2% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 27 | 10% |
| Unknown | 84 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2015.
All research outputs
#20,674,485
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Production Economics
#746
of 923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#291,703
of 395,593 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Production Economics
#16
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 923 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 395,593 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.