↓ Skip to main content

乗法誤差モデルを用いた最尤非対称MDSによる文字色と背景色の組み合わせに対する視認性データの分析

Overview of attention for article published in Kodo Keiryogaku (The Japanese Journal of Behaviormetrics), January 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#37 of 108)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
乗法誤差モデルを用いた最尤非対称MDSによる文字色と背景色の組み合わせに対する視認性データの分析
Published in
Kodo Keiryogaku (The Japanese Journal of Behaviormetrics), January 2017
DOI 10.2333/jbhmk.44.209
Authors

佐部利 真吾

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 April 2019.
All research outputs
#15,818,525
of 25,998,826 outputs
Outputs from Kodo Keiryogaku (The Japanese Journal of Behaviormetrics)
#37
of 108 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#234,731
of 428,501 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Kodo Keiryogaku (The Japanese Journal of Behaviormetrics)
#8
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,998,826 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 108 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 428,501 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.