↓ Skip to main content

Towards a Low-Cost Modelling System for Optimising the Layout of Tidal Turbine Arrays

Overview of attention for article published in Energies, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Towards a Low-Cost Modelling System for Optimising the Layout of Tidal Turbine Arrays
Published in
Energies, November 2015
DOI 10.3390/en81212380
Authors

Stephen Nash, Agnieszka I. Olbert, Michael Hartnett

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 3%
Unknown 39 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 38%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 10%
Student > Master 3 8%
Lecturer 2 5%
Other 2 5%
Other 7 18%
Unknown 7 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 22 55%
Energy 4 10%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 5%
Unspecified 1 3%
Environmental Science 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 10 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2015.
All research outputs
#20,657,128
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Energies
#7,208
of 11,595 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#291,382
of 395,377 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Energies
#55
of 76 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,595 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 395,377 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 76 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.