| Title |
LINEs, SINEs and repetitive DNA: non-LTR retrotransposons in plant genomes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Plant Molecular Biology, August 1999
|
| DOI | 10.1023/a:1006212929794 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Thomas Schmidt |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 154 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 5 | 3% |
| United States | 4 | 3% |
| Canada | 2 | 1% |
| Brazil | 2 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| Czechia | 2 | 1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| China | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 3 | 2% |
| Unknown | 131 | 85% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 41 | 27% |
| Student > Master | 24 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 6% |
| Other | 26 | 17% |
| Unknown | 15 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 107 | 69% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 22 | 14% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 1% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | <1% |
| Computer Science | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 5 | 3% |
| Unknown | 16 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 February 2017.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Plant Molecular Biology
#1,017
of 2,880 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,275
of 34,663 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Molecular Biology
#3
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,880 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 34,663 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.