You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Evaluation of a culturally adapted training course in Indigenous e-mental health
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Australasian Psychiatry, September 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1177/1039856215608282 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kylie M Dingwall, Stefanie Puszka, Michelle Sweet, Patj Patj Janama Robert Mills, Tricia Nagel |
| Abstract |
To report the impact of the Indigenous e-mental health training course 'Yarning about Indigenous Mental Health using the AIMhi Stay Strong App'. Participants were trained in e-mental health and the use of one of the first culturally adapted e-mental health interventions - The AIMhi Stay Strong App. Between October 2013 and December 2014, 138 participants completed the 'Yarning about Indigenous Mental Health using the AIMhi Stay Strong App' training course and 130 completed pre- and post-training questionnaires to explore knowledge and confidence in a number of areas trained. Paired t-tests showed significant improvements across all measures of skill and knowledge except for confidence in using computers. E-mental health is a relatively new development that may contribute to improved access to mental health services for rural and remote Indigenous Australians, particularly where such tools are culturally adapted. Whilst current knowledge and use of e-mental health tools in this group of Northern Territory service providers was limited, perceived knowledge and confidence in use was significantly improved following training. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 6 | 43% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 14% |
| Denmark | 1 | 7% |
| United States | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 4 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 86% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 7% |
| Scientists | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 87 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 16% |
| Researcher | 11 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 17 | 19% |
| Unknown | 27 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 18 | 20% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 10% |
| Computer Science | 8 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 10 | 11% |
| Unknown | 30 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 February 2016.
All research outputs
#3,523,536
of 24,585,148 outputs
Outputs from Australasian Psychiatry
#139
of 1,697 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,785
of 279,543 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Australasian Psychiatry
#5
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,585,148 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,697 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,543 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.