↓ Skip to main content

Modified muscle activity in LE

Overview of attention for article published in Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
90 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Modified muscle activity in LE
Published in
Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports, December 2015
DOI 10.1111/sms.12584
Pubmed ID
Authors

L. J. Heales, B. Vicenzino, D. A. MacDonald, P. W. Hodges

Abstract

Lateral epicondylalgia (LE) is associated with a reduced wrist extensor muscle activity and altered biomechanics. This study compared the coordination between forearm muscles during gripping in individuals with LE and pain-free controls. Intramuscular electrodes recorded myoelectric activity from extensor carpi radialis brevis/longus (ECRB/ECRL), extensor digitorum communis (EDC), flexor digitorum superficialis/profundus (FDS/FDP), and flexor carpi radialis (FCR), bilaterally, in 15 participants with unilateral LE and 15 pain-free controls. Participants performed a gripping task at 20% maximum force in four arm positions. The contribution of each muscle was expressed as a proportion of the summed electromyography of all muscles. In individuals with LE, ECRB contributed less to total electromyography in the symptomatic arm but not the asymptomatic arm than pain-free controls. The contribution of EDC and FDP to total electromyography was greater in both the symptomatic and asymptomatic arm of the LE group, than pain-free controls. No other differences were observed between groups. Subtle differences in muscle activation were present with differing arm positions. These findings indicate forearm muscle activity is modified in LE. It is unknown whether this is cause or effect. Changes in the asymptomatic side may imply involvement of central mechanisms.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 1%
Unknown 89 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 17 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 17%
Student > Master 12 13%
Other 6 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Other 19 21%
Unknown 16 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 21%
Sports and Recreations 11 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 4%
Engineering 2 2%
Other 5 6%
Unknown 21 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 August 2020.
All research outputs
#4,760,513
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports
#1,270
of 2,945 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,771
of 395,418 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports
#34
of 71 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,945 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 395,418 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 71 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.