| Title |
Current techniques in postmortem imaging with specific attention to paediatric applications
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Pediatric Radiology, December 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00247-009-1486-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tessa Sieswerda-Hoogendoorn, Rick R. van Rijn |
| Abstract |
In this review we discuss the decline of and current controversies regarding conventional autopsies and the use of postmortem radiology as an adjunct to and a possible alternative for the conventional autopsy. We will address the radiological techniques and applications for postmortem imaging in children. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 52 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 8 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 8% |
| Professor | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 14 | 26% |
| Unknown | 14 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 27 | 51% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 4% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Unknown | 15 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 January 2017.
All research outputs
#1,218,703
of 22,659,164 outputs
Outputs from Pediatric Radiology
#13
of 2,071 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,217
of 163,433 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pediatric Radiology
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,659,164 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,071 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 163,433 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.