↓ Skip to main content

Natural and unnatural oil slicks in the Gulf of Mexico

Overview of attention for article published in JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH: OCEANS, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
2 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
15 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
212 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
122 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Natural and unnatural oil slicks in the Gulf of Mexico
Published in
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH: OCEANS, December 2015
DOI 10.1002/2015jc011062
Pubmed ID
Authors

I. R. MacDonald, O. Garcia‐Pineda, A. Beet, S. Daneshgar Asl, L. Feng, G. Graettinger, D. French‐McCay, J. Holmes, C. Hu, F. Huffer, I. Leifer, F. Muller‐Karger, A. Solow, M. Silva, G. Swayze

Abstract

When wind speeds are 2-10 m s(-1), reflective contrasts in the ocean surface make oil slicks visible to synthetic aperture radar (SAR) under all sky conditions. Neural network analysis of satellite SAR images quantified the magnitude and distribution of surface oil in the Gulf of Mexico from persistent, natural seeps and from the Deepwater Horizon (DWH) discharge. This analysis identified 914 natural oil seep zones across the entire Gulf of Mexico in pre-2010 data. Their ∼0.1 µm slicks covered an aggregated average of 775 km(2). Assuming an average volume of 77.5 m(3) over an 8-24 h lifespan per oil slick, the floating oil indicates a surface flux of 2.5-9.4 × 10(4) m(3) yr(-1). Oil from natural slicks was regionally concentrated: 68%, 25%, 7%, and <1% of the total was observed in the NW, SW, NE, and SE Gulf, respectively. This reflects differences in basin history and hydrocarbon generation. SAR images from 2010 showed that the 87 day DWH discharge produced a surface-oil footprint fundamentally different from background seepage, with an average ocean area of 11,200 km(2) (SD 5028) and a volume of 22,600 m(3) (SD 5411). Peak magnitudes of oil were detected during equivalent, ∼14 day intervals around 23 May and 18 June, when wind speeds remained <5 m s(-1). Over this interval, aggregated volume of floating oil decreased by 21%; area covered increased by 49% (p < 0.1), potentially altering its ecological impact. The most likely causes were increased applications of dispersant and surface burning operations.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 122 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 119 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 25%
Researcher 26 21%
Student > Master 14 11%
Student > Bachelor 11 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 7%
Other 16 13%
Unknown 17 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 31 25%
Environmental Science 24 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 14%
Chemistry 8 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 5%
Other 13 11%
Unknown 23 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 October 2022.
All research outputs
#1,189,750
of 25,552,933 outputs
Outputs from JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH: OCEANS
#127
of 4,869 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,220
of 399,279 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH: OCEANS
#5
of 134 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,552,933 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,869 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 399,279 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 134 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.