| Title |
Why Does Patient Activation Matter? An Examination of the Relationships Between Patient Activation and Health-Related Outcomes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of General Internal Medicine, November 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11606-011-1931-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jessica Greene, Judith H. Hibbard |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 8 | 44% |
| Spain | 3 | 17% |
| Japan | 1 | 6% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 5 | 28% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 72% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 17% |
| Scientists | 2 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 748 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 16 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | <1% |
| Sweden | 2 | <1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 719 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 121 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 112 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 110 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 62 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 53 | 7% |
| Other | 154 | 21% |
| Unknown | 136 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 217 | 29% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 86 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 66 | 9% |
| Psychology | 54 | 7% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 34 | 5% |
| Other | 110 | 15% |
| Unknown | 181 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 78. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 September 2023.
All research outputs
#554,614
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#438
of 8,256 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,820
of 251,832 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#1
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,256 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 251,832 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.