↓ Skip to main content

Social Media Use and Perceived Emotional Support Among US Young Adults

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Community Health, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
74 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
235 Mendeley
Title
Social Media Use and Perceived Emotional Support Among US Young Adults
Published in
Journal of Community Health, November 2015
DOI 10.1007/s10900-015-0128-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ariel Shensa, Jaime E. Sidani, Liu yi Lin, Nicholas D. Bowman, Brian A. Primack

Abstract

Low emotional support is associated with poor health outcomes. Engagement with face-to-face social networks is one way of increasing emotional support. However, it is not yet known whether engagement with proliferating electronic social networks is similarly associated with increased emotional support. Thus, the purpose of this study was to assess associations between social media use and perceived emotional support in a large, nationally-representative sample. In October 2014, we collected data from 1796 U.S. adults ages 19-32. We assessed social media use using both total time spent and frequency of visits to each of the 11 most popular social media platforms. Our dependent variable was perceived emotional support as measured by the brief Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) emotional support scale. A multivariable model including all sociodemographic covariates and accounting for survey weights demonstrated that, compared with the lowest quartile of time on social media, being in the highest quartile (spending two or more hours per day) was significantly associated with decreased odds of having higher perceived emotional support (AOR 0.62, 95 % CI 0.40, 0.94). However, compared with those in the lowest quartile, being in the highest quartile regarding frequency of social media use was not significantly associated with perceived emotional support (AOR 0.70, 95 % CI 0.45, 1.09). In conclusion, while the cross-sectional nature of these data hinder inference regarding directionality, it seems that heavy users of social media may actually feel less and not more emotional support.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 235 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Unknown 233 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 41 17%
Student > Bachelor 36 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 12%
Researcher 17 7%
Student > Postgraduate 11 5%
Other 42 18%
Unknown 60 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 47 20%
Social Sciences 38 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 13 6%
Other 33 14%
Unknown 74 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 November 2023.
All research outputs
#1,472,796
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Community Health
#85
of 1,371 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,012
of 400,461 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Community Health
#5
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,371 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 400,461 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.