You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The ethics of offsetting nature
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Ecology & the Environment, December 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1890/150021 |
| Authors |
Christopher D Ives, Sarah A Bekessy |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 46 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 8 | 17% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 11% |
| United States | 5 | 11% |
| Canada | 3 | 7% |
| Germany | 2 | 4% |
| South Africa | 2 | 4% |
| Ireland | 1 | 2% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Bosnia and Herzegovina | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 16 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 30 | 65% |
| Scientists | 12 | 26% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 194 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 2 | 1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 190 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 30 | 15% |
| Researcher | 28 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 27 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 12% |
| Other | 13 | 7% |
| Other | 27 | 14% |
| Unknown | 46 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 61 | 31% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 39 | 20% |
| Social Sciences | 17 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 2% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 11 | 6% |
| Unknown | 58 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 66. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 December 2022.
All research outputs
#655,735
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Ecology & the Environment
#230
of 1,785 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,716
of 398,860 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Ecology & the Environment
#3
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,785 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 37.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 398,860 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.