↓ Skip to main content

A biologically constrained model of the whole basal ganglia addressing the paradoxes of connections and selection

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Computational Neuroscience, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#20 of 307)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
Title
A biologically constrained model of the whole basal ganglia addressing the paradoxes of connections and selection
Published in
Journal of Computational Neuroscience, September 2013
DOI 10.1007/s10827-013-0476-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jean Liénard, Benoît Girard

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 3 5%
France 3 5%
United Kingdom 1 2%
China 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 50 85%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 31%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 20%
Student > Master 6 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Lecturer 3 5%
Other 10 17%
Unknown 6 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 17 29%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 14%
Computer Science 7 12%
Engineering 4 7%
Psychology 3 5%
Other 12 20%
Unknown 8 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 May 2020.
All research outputs
#3,924,270
of 22,834,308 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Computational Neuroscience
#20
of 307 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,080
of 205,252 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Computational Neuroscience
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,834,308 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 307 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 205,252 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them