↓ Skip to main content

Epigenome-Wide Association Study of Wellbeing

Overview of attention for article published in Twin Research & Human Genetics, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Epigenome-Wide Association Study of Wellbeing
Published in
Twin Research & Human Genetics, December 2015
DOI 10.1017/thg.2015.85
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bart M. L. Baselmans, Jenny van Dongen, Michel G. Nivard, Bochao D. Lin, BIOS Consortium, Nuno R. Zilhão, Dorret I. Boomsma, Meike Bartels

Abstract

Wellbeing (WB) is a major topic of research across several scientific disciplines, partly driven by its strong association with psychological and mental health. Twin-family studies have found that both genotype and environment play an important role in explaining the variance in WB. Epigenetic mechanisms, such as DNA methylation, regulate gene expression, and may mediate genetic and environmental effects on WB. Here, for the first time, we apply an epigenome-wide association study (EWAS) approach to identify differentially methylated sites associated with individual differences in WB. Subjects were part of the longitudinal survey studies of the Netherlands Twin Register (NTR) and participated in the NTR biobank project between 2002 and 2011. WB was assessed by a short inventory that measures satisfaction with life (SAT). DNA methylation was measured in whole blood by the Illumina Infinium HumanMethylation450 BeadChip (HM450k array) and the association between WB and DNA methylation level was tested at 411,169 autosomal sites. Two sites (cg10845147, p = 1.51 * 10-8 and cg01940273, p = 2.34 * 10-8) reached genome-wide significance following Bonferonni correction. Four more sites (cg03329539, p = 2.76* 10-7; cg09716613, p = 3.23 * 10-7; cg04387347, p = 3.95 * 10-7; and cg02290168, p = 5.23 * 10-7) were considered to be genome-wide significant when applying the widely used criterion of a FDR q value < 0.05. Gene ontology (GO) analysis highlighted enrichment of several central nervous system categories among higher-ranking methylation sites. Overall, these results provide a first insight into the epigenetic mechanisms associated with WB and lay the foundations for future work aiming to unravel the biological mechanisms underlying a complex trait like WB.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 34 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 18%
Student > Bachelor 5 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Researcher 2 6%
Other 5 15%
Unknown 7 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 6 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 9%
Computer Science 2 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 6%
Other 7 21%
Unknown 10 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 February 2022.
All research outputs
#3,343,181
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Twin Research & Human Genetics
#108
of 761 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,740
of 395,421 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Twin Research & Human Genetics
#4
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 761 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 395,421 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.