↓ Skip to main content

Do Interventions to Increase Walking Work? A Systematic Review of Interventions in Children and Adolescents

Overview of attention for article published in Sports Medicine, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
65 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
262 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Do Interventions to Increase Walking Work? A Systematic Review of Interventions in Children and Adolescents
Published in
Sports Medicine, December 2015
DOI 10.1007/s40279-015-0432-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Angela Carlin, Marie H. Murphy, Alison M. Gallagher

Abstract

Physical activity (PA) levels decline as children move into adolescence, with this decline more notable in girls. As a consequence, many young people are failing to meet current PA guidelines. Walking has been a cornerstone of PA promotion in adults and may provide an effective means of increasing PA levels among younger people. Our objective was to conduct a systematic review of interventions aimed at promoting increased levels of walking among children and adolescents. Eight electronic databases-CINAHL, Cochrane Library CENTRAL database, EMBASE, Medline OVID, PsycINFO, Scopus, SPORTDiscus and Web of Knowledge-were searched from their inception up to January 2015 using predefined text terms: walking terms AND intervention terms AND population terms AND (physical activity OR exercise). Reference lists of published systematic reviews and original articles included in the review were also screened. Included studies were randomised and non-randomised controlled trials reporting a specific measure of walking levels (self-reported or objective) to assess the effectiveness of interventions aimed at promoting walking in children and adolescents (aged 5-18 years). Only full articles published in English in peer-reviewed journals were included. Risk of bias and behaviour change techniques of included studies were assessed. Twelve studies were included in this review. The majority of studies assessed interventions delivered within an educational setting, with one study conducted within the family setting. Nine of the included studies reported significant increases in walking in intervention groups versus controls. Commonly employed behaviour change techniques within successful interventions included goals and planning, feedback and monitoring, social support and repetition and substitution. Walking interventions, particularly those conducted in the school environment, have the potential to increase PA in children and adolescents. Conclusions on which interventions most effectively increased walking behaviours in this population were hindered by the limited number of identified interventions and the short duration of interventions evaluated. The short-term effectiveness of the majority of included studies on levels of walking in this population is promising and further research, particularly within non-educational settings and targeted at sub-groups (e.g. adolescent girls and overweight/obese children and adolescents), is warranted.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 65 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 262 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 256 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 40 15%
Student > Master 39 15%
Researcher 28 11%
Student > Bachelor 21 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 5%
Other 54 21%
Unknown 66 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 35 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 34 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 29 11%
Social Sciences 27 10%
Psychology 21 8%
Other 34 13%
Unknown 82 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 41. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 June 2017.
All research outputs
#1,024,567
of 25,610,986 outputs
Outputs from Sports Medicine
#892
of 2,889 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,905
of 396,793 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sports Medicine
#24
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,610,986 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,889 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 57.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 396,793 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.