↓ Skip to main content

Vitamin D3 supplementation does not modify cardiovascular risk profile of adults with inadequate vitamin D status

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Nutrition, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
72 Mendeley
Title
Vitamin D3 supplementation does not modify cardiovascular risk profile of adults with inadequate vitamin D status
Published in
European Journal of Nutrition, November 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00394-015-1106-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eric Seibert, Ulrike Lehmann, Annett Riedel, Christof Ulrich, Frank Hirche, Corinna Brandsch, Jutta Dierkes, Matthias Girndt, Gabriele I. Stangl

Abstract

The Nutrition Societies in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland recommend a daily intake of 20 µg vitamin D3 for adults when endogenous synthesis is absent. The current study aimed to elucidate whether this vitamin D3 dose impacts cardiovascular risk markers of adults during the winter months. The study was conducted in Halle (Saale), Germany (51(o) northern latitude) as a placebo-controlled, double-blinded, randomised trial (from January to April). A total of 105 apparently healthy subjects (male and female, 20-71 years old) were included. Subjects were randomly allocated to two groups. One group received a daily 20-µg vitamin D3 dose (n = 54), and the other group received a placebo (n = 51) for 12 weeks. Outcome measures included blood pressure, heart rate, concentrations of renin, aldosterone, serum lipids and vascular calcification markers, and haematologic variables such as pro-inflammatory monocytes. Blood pressure and systemic cardiovascular risk markers remained unchanged by vitamin D3 supplementation, although serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 increased from 38 ± 14 to 73 ± 16 nmol/L at week 12. The placebo and vitamin D groups did not differ in their final cardiovascular risk profile. Daily supplementation of 20 µg vitamin D3 during winter is unlikely to change cardiovascular risk profile.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 1%
Unknown 71 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 15%
Student > Bachelor 9 13%
Researcher 5 7%
Student > Postgraduate 5 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Other 16 22%
Unknown 22 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 26%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 3%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 25 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 October 2021.
All research outputs
#15,351,145
of 22,834,308 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Nutrition
#1,717
of 2,394 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#227,219
of 387,533 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Nutrition
#48
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,834,308 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,394 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 387,533 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.