↓ Skip to main content

Management of prostate cancer patients following radiation therapy after radical surgery referred from urology to radiation oncology departments in Spain

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical and Translational Oncology, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
Title
Management of prostate cancer patients following radiation therapy after radical surgery referred from urology to radiation oncology departments in Spain
Published in
Clinical and Translational Oncology, November 2015
DOI 10.1007/s12094-015-1454-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

A. Gómez Caamaño, A. Zapatero, J. López Torrecilla, X. Maldonado

Abstract

To define usual clinical management of prostate cancer (PCa) patients following postoperative radiation therapy (RT) (adjuvant or salvage) and its evolution over time in radiation oncology (RO) departments in Spain. An epidemiological, cross-sectional, multicentre study was conducted. 567 PCa patients that had undergone radical prostatectomy (RP) and received postoperative RT between February and December of both 2006 and 2011 participated in the study. In patients from 2006, health-related quality of life (HRQoL) was assessed using the EPIC questionnaire. Investigators completed a specific survey on two clinical cases of adjuvant and salvage RT. 70.6 % of patients received salvage RT versus 29.4 % who received adjuvant RT; no significant differences were found in terms of frequency for each procedure between both the years. Regarding the survey, a positive surgical margin was the main criteria used in adjuvant RT decision making. In terms of salvage RT scenario, 85.7 % of the investigators stated that adjuvant RT should have been offered instead, 81.4 % of the investigators agreed on a PSA score >0.2 ng/mL as the main criteria for identifying biochemical recurrence after RP, and 67.4 % of investigators did not consider any PSA score for ruling out salvage RT treatment. Most patients are referred to RO departments to receive salvage RT. Despite the publication of three IA evidence level randomized clinical trials, the patterns for using adjuvant and salvage RT did not change from 2006 to 2011, although patients' profile did. A consensus regarding postoperative RT indications should be reached in order to correct this controversial situation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 2%
Unknown 58 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 10 17%
Student > Bachelor 6 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 8%
Other 4 7%
Researcher 4 7%
Other 12 20%
Unknown 18 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 10 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 10%
Computer Science 3 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Other 7 12%
Unknown 22 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 December 2015.
All research outputs
#13,757,736
of 22,834,308 outputs
Outputs from Clinical and Translational Oncology
#556
of 1,305 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#192,631
of 387,533 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical and Translational Oncology
#14
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,834,308 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,305 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 387,533 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.