↓ Skip to main content

The Temporal Association Between Traditional and Cyber Dating Abuse Among Adolescents

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Youth and Adolescence, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
7 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
139 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
214 Mendeley
Title
The Temporal Association Between Traditional and Cyber Dating Abuse Among Adolescents
Published in
Journal of Youth and Adolescence, November 2015
DOI 10.1007/s10964-015-0380-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jeff R. Temple, Hye Jeong Choi, Meagan Brem, Caitlin Wolford-Clevenger, Gregory L. Stuart, Melissa Fleschler Peskin, JoAnna Elmquist

Abstract

While research has explored adolescents' use of technology to perpetrate dating violence, little is known about how traditional in-person and cyber abuse are linked, and no studies have examined their relationship over time. Using our sample of 780 diverse adolescents (58 % female), we found that traditional and cyber abuse were positively associated, and cyber abuse perpetration and victimization were correlated at each time point. Cyber abuse perpetration in the previous year (spring 2013) predicted cyber abuse perpetration 1 year later (spring 2014), while controlling for traditional abuse and demographic variables. In addition, physical violence victimization and cyber abuse perpetration and victimization predicted cyber abuse victimization the following year. These findings highlight the reciprocal nature of cyber abuse and suggest that victims may experience abuse in multiple contexts.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 214 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 213 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 14%
Student > Bachelor 28 13%
Student > Master 25 12%
Researcher 15 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 7%
Other 34 16%
Unknown 66 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 65 30%
Social Sciences 34 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 7%
Computer Science 8 4%
Arts and Humanities 6 3%
Other 15 7%
Unknown 72 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 64. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 May 2023.
All research outputs
#628,039
of 24,318,236 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Youth and Adolescence
#107
of 1,828 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,813
of 290,175 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Youth and Adolescence
#2
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,318,236 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,828 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 290,175 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.