↓ Skip to main content

Neural decoding based on probabilistic neural network

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Zhejiang University - Science B, April 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
googleplus
2 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
Title
Neural decoding based on probabilistic neural network
Published in
Journal of Zhejiang University - Science B, April 2010
DOI 10.1631/jzus.b0900284
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yi Yu, Shao-min Zhang, Huai-jian Zhang, Xiao-chun Liu, Qiao-sheng Zhang, Xiao-xiang Zheng, Jian-hua Dai

Abstract

Brain-machine interface (BMI) has been developed due to its possibility to cure severe body paralysis. This technology has been used to realize the direct control of prosthetic devices, such as robot arms, computer cursors, and paralyzed muscles. A variety of neural decoding algorithms have been designed to explore relationships between neural activities and movements of the limbs. In this paper, two novel neural decoding methods based on probabilistic neural network (PNN) in rats were introduced, the PNN decoder and the modified PNN (MPNN) decoder. In the experiment, rats were trained to obtain water by pressing a lever over a pressure threshold. Microelectrode array was implanted in the motor cortex to record neural activity, and pressure was recorded by a pressure sensor synchronously. After training, the pressure values were estimated from the neural signals by PNN and MPNN decoders. Their performances were evaluated by a correlation coefficient (CC) and a mean square error (MSE). The results show that the MPNN decoder, with a CC of 0.8657 and an MSE of 0.2563, outperformed the traditionally-used Wiener filter (WF) and Kalman filter (KF) decoders. It was also observed that the discretization level did not affect the MPNN performance, indicating that the MPNN decoder can handle different tasks in BMI system, including the detection of movement states and estimation of continuous kinematic parameters.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 3%
United States 1 3%
Brazil 1 3%
Unknown 33 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 33%
Student > Master 6 17%
Professor 3 8%
Researcher 3 8%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 5 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 12 33%
Computer Science 7 19%
Neuroscience 3 8%
Psychology 2 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 6%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 8 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 September 2020.
All research outputs
#8,601,770
of 25,540,105 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Zhejiang University - Science B
#188
of 705 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,151
of 103,008 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Zhejiang University - Science B
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,540,105 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 705 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 103,008 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.