↓ Skip to main content

Transfer of tactile perceptual learning to untrained neighboring fingers reflects natural use relationships

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neurophysiology, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
9 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
94 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Transfer of tactile perceptual learning to untrained neighboring fingers reflects natural use relationships
Published in
Journal of Neurophysiology, December 2015
DOI 10.1152/jn.00181.2015
Pubmed ID
Authors

Harriet Dempsey-Jones, Vanessa Harrar, Jonathan Oliver, Heidi Johansen-Berg, Charles Spence, Tamar R Makin

Abstract

Tactile learning transfers from trained to untrained fingers in a pattern that reflects overlap between the representations of fingers in the somatosensory system (e.g. neurons with multi-finger receptive fields). While physical proximity on the body is known to determine the topography of somatosensory representations, tactile co-activation is also an established organising principle of somatosensory topography. Here we investigated whether tactile co-activation, induced by habitual inter-finger cooperative use (use pattern), shapes inter-finger overlap. To this end, we used psychophysics to compare the transfer of tactile learning from the middle finger to its adjacent fingers. This allowed us to compare transfer to two fingers that are both physically and cortically adjacent to the middle finger, but have differing use-patterns. Specifically, the middle finger is used more frequently with the ring than with the index finger. We predicted this should lead to greater representational overlap between the former than the latter pair. Further, this difference in overlap should be reflected in differential learning transfer from the middle to index versus ring fingers. Subsequently, we predicted temporary learning-related changes in the middle finger's representation (e.g. cortical magnification) would cause transient interference in perceptual thresholds of the ring, but not the index finger. Supporting this, longitudinal analysis revealed a divergence where learning transfer was fast to the index finger, but relatively delayed to the ring finger. Our results support the theory that tactile co-activation patterns between digits affect their topographic relationships. Our findings emphasise how action shapes perception and somatosensory organisation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 94 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 27%
Researcher 20 21%
Student > Master 12 13%
Student > Bachelor 6 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 5%
Other 13 14%
Unknown 13 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 26 28%
Psychology 23 24%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 9%
Engineering 8 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 3%
Other 6 6%
Unknown 20 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 60. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 April 2018.
All research outputs
#707,945
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neurophysiology
#61
of 8,424 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,766
of 395,281 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neurophysiology
#2
of 114 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,424 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 395,281 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 114 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.