↓ Skip to main content

Mechanisms of Long Non-coding RNAs in Mammalian Nervous System Development, Plasticity, Disease, and Evolution

Overview of attention for article published in Neuron, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
358 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
450 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mechanisms of Long Non-coding RNAs in Mammalian Nervous System Development, Plasticity, Disease, and Evolution
Published in
Neuron, December 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.neuron.2015.09.045
Pubmed ID
Authors

James A. Briggs, Ernst J. Wolvetang, John S. Mattick, John L. Rinn, Guy Barry

Abstract

Only relatively recently has it become clear that mammalian genomes encode tens of thousands of long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs). A striking 40% of these are expressed specifically in the brain, where they show precisely regulated temporal and spatial expression patterns. This begs the question, what is the functional role of these many lncRNA transcripts in the brain? Here we canvass a growing number of mechanistic studies that have elucidated central roles for lncRNAs in the regulation of nervous system development and function. We also survey studies indicating that neurological and psychiatric disorders may ensue when these mechanisms break down. Finally, we synthesize these insights with evidence from comparative genomics to argue that lncRNAs may have played important roles in brain evolution, by virtue of their abundant sequence innovation in mammals and plausible mechanistic connections to the adaptive processes that occurred recently in the primate and human lineages.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 450 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 3 <1%
United States 3 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 439 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 92 20%
Researcher 79 18%
Student > Master 51 11%
Student > Bachelor 45 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 23 5%
Other 69 15%
Unknown 91 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 106 24%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 106 24%
Neuroscience 76 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 29 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 1%
Other 26 6%
Unknown 101 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 December 2022.
All research outputs
#1,735,398
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Neuron
#2,778
of 9,545 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,406
of 395,421 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuron
#56
of 113 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,545 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 395,421 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 113 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.